🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.