🔗 Share this article

Labuschagne evenly coats butter on the top and bottom of a slice of plain bread. “That’s essential,” he states as he lowers the lid of his toastie maker. “There you go. Then you get it crisp on the outside.” He opens the grill to reveal a perfectly browned of ideal crispiness, the melted cheese happily melting inside. “So this is the key technique,” he announces. At which point, he does something unexpected and strange.

Already, it’s clear a glaze of ennui is beginning to cover your eyes. The red lights of sportswriting pretension are blinking intensely. You’re likely conscious that Labuschagne made 160 runs for his state team this week and is being feverishly talked up for an Australian Test recall before the Ashes series.

You probably want to read more about that. But first – you now grasp with irritation – you’re going to have to endure a section of light-hearted musing about toasted sandwiches, plus an extra unwanted bonus paragraph of self-referential analysis in the “you” perspective. You sigh again.

He turns the sandwich on to a dish and heads over the fridge. “Not many people do this,” he announces, “but I genuinely enjoy the grilled sandwich chilled. There, in the fridge. You get that cheese to harden up, head to practice, come back. Perfect. Sandwich is perfect.”

The Cricket Context

Okay, to cut to the chase. How about we cover the cricket bit to begin with? Small reward for reading until now. And while there may still be six weeks until the initial match, Labuschagne’s century against the Tasmanian side – his third in recent months in all cricket – feels significantly impactful.

This is an Australian top order seriously lacking performance and method, exposed by the Proteas in the World Test Championship final, highlighted further in the following Caribbean tour. Labuschagne was left out during that trip, but on a certain level you gathered Australia were keen to restore him at the first opportunity. Now he appears to have given them the perfect excuse.

And this is a approach the team should follow. The opener has just one 100 in his recent 44 batting efforts. The young batsman looks hardly a Test opener and rather like the attractive performer who might act as a batsman in a Indian film. None of the alternatives has presented a strong argument. Nathan McSweeney looks out of form. Marcus Harris is still oddly present, like unwanted guests. Meanwhile their leader, Pat Cummins, is unfit and suddenly this appears as a weirdly lightweight side, lacking strength or equilibrium, the kind of effortless self-assurance that has often helped Australia dominate before a match begins.

Labuschagne’s Return

Here comes Labuschagne: a top-ranked Test batsman as recently as 2023, just left out from the ODI side, the right person to restore order to a fragile lineup. And we are informed this is a more relaxed and thoughtful Labuschagne currently: a simplified, no-frills Labuschagne, less maniacally obsessed with minor adjustments. “I believe I have really cut out extras,” he said after his hundred. “Less focused on technique, just what I should bat effectively.”

Clearly, few accept this. Probably this is a rebrand that exists entirely in Labuschagne’s own head: still endlessly adjusting that approach from dawn to dusk, going deeper into fundamentals than any player has attempted. Like basic approach? Marnus will spend months in the practice sessions with trainers and footage, thoroughly reshaping his game into the least technical batter that has ever been seen. This is just the quality of the focused, and the quality that has long made Labuschagne one of the highly engaging players in the game.

The Broader Picture

It could be before this inscrutably unpredictable historic rivalry, there is even a type of appealing difference to Labuschagne’s endless focus. For England we have a team for whom technical study, especially personal critique, is a forbidden topic. Feel the flavours. Stay in the moment. Embrace the current.

For Australia you have a player such as Labuschagne, a individual terminally obsessed with the sport and totally indifferent by public perception, who sees cricket even in the gaps in the game, who treats this absurd sport with just the right measure of absurd reverence it deserves.

This approach succeeded. During his focused era – from the time he walked out to substitute for an injured Steve Smith at the famous ground in 2019 to until late 2022 – Labuschagne somehow managed to see the game with greater insight. To reach it – through absolute focus – on a elevated, strange, passionate tier. During his stint in Kent league cricket, fellow players saw him on the morning of a game positioned on a seat in a trance-like state, literally visualising every single ball of his time at the crease. As per cricket statisticians, during the early stages of his career a statistically unfathomable number of chances were dropped off his bat. Remarkably Labuschagne had anticipated outcomes before fielders could respond to affect it.

Form Issues

It’s possible this was why his career began to disintegrate the point he became number one. There were no worlds left to visualise, just a empty space before his eyes. Additionally – he began doubting his favorite stroke, got unable to move forward and seemed to forget where his off-stump was. But it’s connected really. Meanwhile his mentor, D’Costa, believes a attention to shorter formats started to undermine belief in his alignment. Encouragingly: he’s now excluded from the one-day team.

Certainly it’s relevant, too, that Labuschagne is a strongly faithful person, an evangelical Christian who thinks that this is all basically written out in advance, who thus sees his role as one of accessing this state of flow, no matter how mysterious it may look to the mortal of us.

This approach, to my mind, has long been the main point of difference between him and Steve Smith, a inherently talented player